The Other Side of the Story
.or what they chose not
to show on TV.
By writing this introduction, we hope to reassure
members of the public who have a Cavalier or did intend (prior to the
broadcast) buying one, that the Breed is not riddled with health issues as was
portrayed on the TV programme "Pedigree Dogs Exposed". I am sure everyone who
watched was shocked at the contents, as it painted a very grim picture of the
Cavalier and their breeders who were made to look like uncaring, money
grabbing, monsters only interested in winning in competition or passing on
unhealthy puppies to the general public. However, both sides of the story
should have been aired and this did not happen, as the programme was very
negative, one sided and focused on the worse case scenarios. Of course, to get
the ratings, the programme needed to attract attention, and sensationalism
certainly works in selling newspapers and getting viewers.
No one is denying that the Cavalier breed is not without
its problems, just as in any breed, but the programme gave the impression that
a large percentage are walking time bombs just waiting to go off, who will cost
their owners a fortune in vet bills and give them nothing but pain and sorrow.
Not true. The majority live long, trouble free lives giving endless pleasure.
The Cavalier excels as a companion dog and most people who have had one would
never change for another breed. Little was said about the money, time and
effort that have been put in by the breeders and the clubs to do what is
required to allow our breed to continue to thrive and live as healthy lives as
possible. Hopefully this website will go some way to setting the record
straight. |
|
Some comments on the TV programme.
The boxer was filmed in the throes of an epileptic fit.
Why? For the good of dogs or to make graphic TV. Epilepsy has been around for
centuries, both in humans and animals. Indeed, it is said that Julius Caesar
was a sufferer. Nowadays, the condition in humans and dogs is managed by
medication. Following the TV programme, the owner of the boxer was stopped on
their daily walk on the playing fields and told by some to have him put down.
The owner says that she has had him since he was a puppy and she could never
put him down. His medication is largely effective with a fit occurring about
one day a month. How long did the film company hang around waiting to film a
fit to occur so that it could be portrayed as "concerned TV reporting". It was
no more than disgusting voyeurism, comparable to the paparazzi scrambling for
photographs of the dying Princess Diana.
Similarly, while not denying the existence of the
condition syringomyelia, was it necessary to drag the Cavalier around on a lead
indoors to illustrate the reaction? Many caring people who are aware of the
condition SM would have been screaming at their TVs "take the lead off". Why,
apart from the desire to create vivid television, would someone who knows of
the likely reaction do this? In other circumstances, the owner of the dog who
permitted this to happen would be reported for animal cruelty. Whilst the
programme dealt heavily on the view that MRI scanning is the only way to combat
this concern, within the breed, opinion is still divided as to whether this is
the only way to deal with the recurrence of the problem. Furthermore, this
condition is not peculiar to Cavaliers but is seen in Griffons, Chihuahuas,
King Charles Spaniels and other small breeds. Whilst it is complicated and
undetermined how it develops and the mode of inheritance is unknown at the time
of writing, the breed clubs, in particular the Cavalier clubs, for many years,
and more recently the Griffon clubs, have been working hard gathering
information and funding research into the matter.
A further example of the distasteful practices of the
programme makers was to ask a prominent campaigner on cavalier health and
longevity, for help in finding a Cavalier in the throes of dying from heart
trouble. This heartless and horrendous request was refused.
The RSPCA Chief Vet could not disguise his contempt for
Pedigree Dogs, describing dog shows as "a freakish garish beauty pageant" and
"a parade of mutants". Many people believe the RSPCA is concerned with the
welfare of animals, all animals. As 75% of the dogs in the UK are pedigree
dogs, this publicly stated view causes some doubts about the society's attitude
towards them. The RSPCA is a charity and its funding includes donations,
legacies and, sometimes, entire estates from the pedigree dog owning
population. Would you, as a pedigree dog owner wish to support a society with
such a view? He uses the term mutant in a denigrating manner in referring to
pedigree dogs, but then advocates the interbreeding of different breeds. To
produce what? Mutants! Therefore, he is saying, "my mutants of whom I have no
history of their likely size, traits, behaviour, and medical condition are
better than your mutants". The other matter which appears strange about the
RSPCA is that it seems very reluctant to disclose how many healthy dogs it
euthanizes each year (just try asking them, and note the smokescreen they come
back with).
And what of the Kennel Club's dark secret. It was said
that it practised Eugenics. The comparison to and the inclusion of film of Nazi
Germany was reprehensible. However, it could be viewed as the programme
shooting itself in the foot. Whilst abhorring the practices advocated by the
Nazi party, Eugenics in its broader sense is the science concerned with the
detection and elimination of hereditary diseases and disorders by genetic
examination of the parents who may be carriers of such conditions. This is
precisely what the ongoing research and practices of the Cavalier Clubs is all
about.
The heart specialist working with the Cavalier Club was
interviewed and badgered into giving the answer the programme maker wanted
about the progress or lack of it on the matter of the incidence and early onset
of MVD. This was quite clearly at odds with the reports being published by the
Cavalier Club.
There are a number of people around with sophisticated
and powerful publicity machines whose views, although appearing
well-intentioned regarding the welfare of Cavaliers, have very narrow agendas.
Their views should be considered in the same way as the TV programme - with
scepticism. Some of the zealots who feel breeders are not doing enough in the
fight against health issues are advocating crossbreeding Cavaliers with other
breeds. Welsh Springer Spaniels have been suggested. However, they come with
their own set of health problems and it is unthinkable and would be a sad day
if we should lose our unique, lovely breed. Sadly, expensive "designer dogs"
are already becoming desirable to some, with Cavapoos, (cavalier/poodle cross)
and Cavachons, (cavalier/bichons) to name but two. It is unlikely that Cavalier
breeders with any standing would pursue this course and it would seem to give
the green light to the mass-produced market of the puppy farms.
This website is intended to regain the confidence of
Cavalier lovers who will have been as shocked at the broadcast as we all were,
but the health statistics do not endorse that Cavaliers are a doomed breed. The
researchers are now stating that instead of the 30,000 (1/3rd of the Cavalier
population) once reported as being affected with SM it now transpires that the
figures quoted referred in fact to 1/3rd of the Research samples which could
perhaps equate to perhaps hundreds affected rather than the sensationalised
figure mentioned in the program. Quite a difference! More information on this
is available elsewhere on this website.
No one in their right mind wants to breed unhealthy dogs
and pass on problems to prospective puppy owners. We urge you to read on and
hopefully leave the site assured that most Cavaliers can live into old age with
few health issues. Reputable, respected breeders do care and do their best in
spite of what the programme tried to have you believe.
|
|