Pedigree Dogs Exposed

"THE GREATEST ANIMAL WELFARE SCANDAL OF OUR TIME.... PEDIGREE DOGS EXPOSED

A SHOCKING EXPOSURE OF PEDIGREE DOGS. THE DOGS ARE FALLING APART AND THE NUMBER OF GENETIC PROBLEMS ARE INCREASING ALARMINGLY…

…WE ARE IN EFFECT BREEDING THEM TO DEATH"

and that's just the first 30 seconds!

Whilst I do not agree with censorship, I feel that this programme was biased and served only to sensationalise and shock. It did not offer a balanced view at all, more importantly it did not even mention puppy farm breeders who are breeding many breeds for financial gain without thought of dam and sire relationship, often not even sure who the sire is.

I felt the film was out to sensationalise without offering any real discussion of the best way to get everyone working together with a view to breeding out these awful conditions that exist in an awful lot of breeds. A missed opportunity to actually DO SOME GOOD. It was a shame, to me, that show breeders were targeted exclusively, I felt, and yet nothing said about the dogs produced by puppy farms and backyard breeders too.

I am a cavalier owner - not a breeder - I have four very healthy cavaliers of ages varying from 5 to 1. With the exception of minor complaints (upset tummies and the like) we only visit the vets for annual vaccines and health checks. When we started getting dogs we researched various breeds and found many more with more serious hereditary problems than the cavalier. We also made sure we researched local breeders and this is what I attribute to us having a healthy foursome now. Unfortunately a lot of pet owners will buy a dog without researching breeds or breeders, simply because they like the look of the dog, and then they buy one from a puppy farm because it's cheaper. This programme could have addressed this issue by having a section on "how to find the right dog and breeder" which could have educated potential pet owners rather than terrifying them.

I didn't think it right to show the surgery and the screaming pain of that little tricolour cavalier in such graphic fashion, why was the first SM affected dog shown being walked on a collar and lead, when it was specifically said that anything round the neck aggravated the condition? Was this done purposely to show the dog at its worst?

Is it really valid to compare today's dogs with paintings from over 100 years ago - when we all know that a painting is only as true as the artist's talent, and that back then artists were paid more to "enhance" the looks and beauty of their subject?

It is widely accepted that Mitral Valve Disease is an alarming cavalier condition, however I feel that too much time was given to Syringomyelia - when this condition is still in the very early stages of research - not anywhere near enough is understood about it yet - and more importantly the programme did not even mention the latest findings in a very large study carried out in Canada and the US. This study found that it is NOT a cavalier disease, it is a SMALL DOG disease, and has been found to cause more serious problems with YORKIES PUGS and CHIHUAHUAS. The full article can be found here at the bottom of the page: Syringomyelia.

The links with Vaccine reactions can not be ignored, yet they were not mentioned at all during the programme. Thiomersal (also known as thimerosal and mercurothiolate) is a mercury-based substance that is added to some vaccines to prevent them from being contaminated by bacteria and fungi. It is used in the triple vaccine given to puppies at around 6 and 8 weeks old, and annually to most dogs. This substance has been banned for use in human vaccines due to its links with autism - why are we still using it in dogs? Why was this not included in the programme?

Vaccines can cause inflammatory reactions in the nervous system and interrupt that Myelation . The result cases is Encephalities(inflammation of the Brain)and other reactions. If inflammation of the Brain has occurred ,has this stopped the flow of Cerebro Spinal Fluid and caused Syrinxes to form.

Is it more than a co-incidence that the combined Vaccine was introduced in 1983 and the first cases of Syringomyelia were seen around that time? Also according to H H Merrit, Professor of Neurology at Columbia University ,America ,Encephalaties can affect the Spinal Cord ,that is where most Syrinxes are seen. It was stated that the first six months of life nobody paused to add up the doses of mercury being given to tiny babies (substitute this for Cavalier puppies). The compound which was chosen to keep multi-dose vials of vaccines free of infection was thiomersal, which contains 50% mercury. In 1999 in America it was found infants were receiving mercury in excess of Federal legal limits for an adult. Could the link for Cavaliers be the same as for infants, in that the blood brain barrier is not developed for the first six months and that there is bio-chemical evidence in autistic children that they have an impaired capacity to excrete mercury which is a heavy metal and retain it in tissues including hair and the brain? Current research has shown that affected children have a genetic pre-disposition in that they lack an enzyme called metallothionein which normally detoxifies and protects against heavy metals. Because of this, when mercury is given in vaccinations, there is no protection for brain, gut and immune system which suffer damage. Could the information from the British Government that mercury has to be withdrawn from vaccines and also, that mice researched at Columbia University, U.S.A. have been found to have damage in their brain as the result of being exposed to mercury, be of particular interest to Cavalier owners whose Cavaliers have been confirmed as having Syringomyelia, which also can affect the brain? Mercury is a highly toxic substance which can damage all organs of the body, including the brain, and is known to have been used as a preservative in vaccines. Is it possible that some of these genetically susceptible Cavaliers, like the mice researched in America, have had damage to their brain because of the mercury in the vaccinations and had Syringo problems, especially now that many neurologists have come to the conclusion that most Cavaliers have a misshapen occipital bone and are living normal, unaffected lives.

Another study has over the years collected about 100 pedigrees of Cavaliers already suffering from heart trouble (MDV) and within about a month of having their vaccination, their heart condition suddenly worsened and they died shortly afterwards, and, also, trying to find out whether the shape and size of the Cavalier skull could be involved in the Syringomyelia problem.

May I be allowed to pass on this quote which has just been made by Dr Marino; I have been given permission by the Cavalier Breeder to do this. This Cavalier Breeder has just taken part in a CHIARI/COMS Project at LIVS, America. I really think what Dr Marino has said will give some comfort to many Owners of Cavaliers. Dr Marino stated that CHIARI/COMS is CLEARLY not a Cavalier Disease, and that the medical community needs to stop classifying it as such. IT IS A SMALL DOG DISEASE and CAVALIERS are only ONE of the BREEDS that have a problem. He actually sees more serious problems with YORKIES PUGS and CHIHUAHUAS. Other affected Breeds are MALTESE TERRIERS MINATURE DACHSHUNDS TOY POODLE BICHON FRISE, SHIH TZU, POMERANIAN, BOSTON TERRIER, PEKINGESE, and MINATURE PINSCHER.

Hopefully now ,because of Dr Marino's comments ,as he has said that SM is NOT A CAVALIER DISEASE it is a SMALL DOG DISEASE, that the speculation that only Cavaliers have SM will now stop, and the SM Researchers will be allowed to find out why SMALL DOGS are being so affected by SM. Finally Dr Marino was so definite in his comments which were, WE HAVE TO CHANGE OUR WAY OF THINKING AND STOP CALLING THIS A CAVALIER DISEASE. THERE are many other SMALL DOGS involved in the SM Problem

Whilst I didn't think the Kennel Club came across very well, I do agree that such a body is necessary to keep some semblance of legitimacy and to show the puppy farmers from the good breeders.

I do feel that it really is time for everyone who has the welfare of dogs at heart to sit up and take notice - there ARE good breeders out there who TRULY have the welfare of their breed at heart - this programme served only to scare the public into thinking that all pedigree dogs should be avoided at all costs. It could have been an excellent platform on which to educate, instead it was a biased, ill-informed attack on selected breeds, and I feel a waste of my licence fee.